Saturday, March 18, 2023

The Plants That Will Disappear First in a Crisis


In a crisis, people will turn to plants once again for both food and medicine.

And there are some plants that will vanish faster than all others.

So the only way to make sure you have them when you need them is to grow them in your own backyard.

The Plants That Will Disappear First in a Crisis

The Plants That Will Disappear First in a Crisis

I’ve gathered all the seeds for growing these plants and placed them inside a Medicinal Garden Kit.

But I only managed to make 300 packages like this:

The Plants That Will Disappear First in a Crisis

All these seeds have been handpicked from the very best plants.

What you see is what you get—seeds for powerful medicinal plants that are perfect for making your own remedies at home, now or in times of need.

This package offers you more than you could ask for: a natural antibiotic, a herbal painkiller, a wound healer, and many more.

Check out the entire list here.

God bless,

P.S. However, there is a limited number of these seeds and the demand is huge–no wonder, with all that’s happening in the world right now. Click here to see if there are any left for you!




In the 1946 case of In re Yamashita,[u] Rutledge rendered an opinion that was later characterized by Ferren as "one of the Court's truly great, and influential, dissents".[1]: 305  The case involved the Japanese general Tomoyuki Yamashita, who commanded soldiers of the Imperial Japanese Army in the Philippines during World War II.[22]: 222  At the end of the war, troops under Yamashita's command killed tens of thousands of Filipinos, many of whom were civilians.[9]: 328  On the basis that he was responsible for the actions of his troops, Yamashita was charged with war crimes and tried before a military commission.[22]: 222  At trial, the prosecution could not demonstrate either that Yamashita was aware of the atrocities committed by his troops or that he had any control over their actions; witnesses testified that they were responsible for the killings and that Yamashita had no knowledge of them.[22]: 222  The commission, which consisted of five American generals, nonetheless found him guilty and sentenced him to death by hanging.[9]: 328  Yamashita petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that the conviction was unlawful due to a bevy of procedural irregularities, including the admission of hearsay and fabricated evidence, restrictions on the defense's ability to cross-examine witnesses, a lack of time for the defense to prepare its case, and a dearth of proof that Yamashita (as opposed to his troops) was guilty.[9]: 328–329  Although the justices desired to stay out of questions of military justice, Rutledge and Murphy, who were gravely worried by what they viewed as serious procedural problems, convinced their colleagues to grant review and hear arguments in the case.[22]: 222  On February 4, 1946, the Court ruled by a 6–2 vote against Yamashita, upholding the result of the trial.[22]: 222  Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Stone stated that the Court could consider only whether the military commission was validly formed, not whether Yamashita was innocent or guilty.[28]: 155  Since the United States had not yet signed a peace







No comments:

Post a Comment